Posts Tagged ‘Republican Party’

Taxes, Part II: A Righteous Rant

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011

I know I promised an entry about taxation without representation—and I promise I’m getting to it—but this made my blood boil and I had to write about it.

This paragraph in particular enraged me:

John Paulson, the most successful hedge-fund manager of all, bet against the mortgage market one year and then bet with Glenn Beck in the gold market the next. Paulson made himself $9 billion in fees in just two years. His current tax bill on that $9 billion? Zero.

Congress lets hedge-fund managers earn all they can now and pay their taxes years from now.

This guy gets his day-to-day money by borrowing against his assets at a ridiculously low rate. Which means that according to the IRS, he made no money last year… despite being $9 billion richer now than he was in 2008.

And the worse part for those of us who pay our fair share is that even if he was paying taxes on all $9 billion of his income, it would have been at a rate of 15%, because people like him make their money through “capital gains” rather than through wages like the rest of us peons.

Think about that for a second. Think about the fact that the government almost shut down over what ended up being about $11 billion in actual cuts. If John Paulson had paid the capital gains rate, he alone would have put $1.35 billion in the treasury—a good 10% of that, by himself. If he were paying the actual marginal tax rate that wage-earners over $373,000 pay—that’s 35%—that would have been $3.15 billion more in tax revenues from him alone.

Now how many John Paulsons do you think there are in this country? How many more hedge fund managers who are paying the 15% rate—which is well lower than the average person pays, particularly when you take the 12% payroll tax into account—do you think there are in this country?

And how the hell can Republicans grouse about how the rich are overtaxed when a guy who made $9 billion over the last two years hasn’t paid one penny of tax? How hollow, how empty, how laughable does this make the Republicans’ fear-mongering about the deficit?

Now, I don’t entirely blame John Paulson for paying $0 in taxes. I won’t deny that I take advantage of every possible legal opportunity to lower my tax burden too. If I can legally deduct it, I deduct it. That’s how the game works. He’s doing what the law allows him to do.

But I do blame him, and his fellow wealthy-class ilk, for creating a system whereby they get to weasel out of paying their fair share by buying members of Congress to do their bidding.

Remember, your and my tax cuts were held hostage so that people like John Paulson—who weren’t going to pay their damn taxes anyway—would be able to keep their theoretical tax cuts. We real Americans have been told throughout this recession that we’d have to “tighten our belts” and “make do with less” in jobs, in benefits, in federal programs to help the poor and elderly, in states being able to pay teachers and fund schools… and by God we can’t raise taxes in a recession!

So instead of letting taxes on the wealthy go back to where they were under Bill Clinton—and the ’90s certainly weren’t a bad time to be wealthy, as anyone who was wealthy then will undoubtedly tell you—the cost of the tax cuts that helped cash-strapped working parents buy school supplies for their kids or that helped a few more working families go on a little vacation this year and stand on the left side of the DC Metro escalators was that rich people like John Paulson would get their tax break too.

They’re job creators! They shouldn’t have to share in the sacrifice! So here we’re left like saps holding the bag on the snipe hunt while the “job creators” hoard our nation’s wealth and find more excuses to lay off working Americans.

And why did this work? Because each and every member of one party, and far too large a proportion of the other, was put in office by the wealthy and powerful like John Paulson to do the bidding of the wealthy and powerful like John Paulson. “Of the people, for the people, by the people” my ass… when someone like John Paulson can buy a Congressional race using the change he digs out from between his couch cushions, the voice of “the people” is never heard in the halls of Congress.

Is there any better exemplar of the moral bankruptcy of our nation than John Paulson? A hedge-fund manager who has produced nothing, who has created nothing of value. He’s moved some people’s money around and made $9 billion for his effort. How has he made the country a better place? How has he improved our nation’s institutions, its industry, its culture, its people? The answer is that he hasn’t… and he hasn’t even contributed to our national treasury with his taxes!

And yet here we are cutting education funding, laying off teachers and firefighters, telling the poor that they can go elsewhere for heating assistance and telling the parents of hungry and sick children that funding for WIC and S-CHIP isn’t going to be there for them. Here we are eliminating collective bargaining rights for police officers and teachers, telling them that they’re going to be paid less and have less job security, because the state’s out of money. Here we are cutting hundreds of thousands of jobs from the government over the next couple of years because the federal government is supposedly broke.

And yet we have the gall to call ourselves a “Christian nation.” What’s Christian about this? What’s moral about this? What’s in any way acceptable about this? Nothing.

Working Americans are being screwed left and right, by their government and by their employers (if they’re lucky enough to have them), because “we don’t have the money.” We don’t have the money for schools or health care or benefits or a pension or to keep Medicare solvent.

Bullcrap. We do have the money. We have the money to give health care to every man, woman, and child in this country, to send every child in this country to a good public school with a teacher who’s paid enough not to have to work a second job just to make ends meet, to have a mass-transit system that’s the envy of the world, to go from a fossil-fuel based economy to a green economy.

We do have the money. It’s sitting in John Paulson’s brokerage account, and the brokerage accounts of a thousand other John Paulsons. When will we the people realize this, and demand that our leaders ask the John Paulsons in America to pay their fair share?

Taxes, Part I: The Choices Before Us

Sunday, April 17th, 2011

Tomorrow, I’m going to file and pay my 2010 income tax. (Yes, I know, right under the wire… but that’s why the wire exists, no?) I’m obviously not going to give the particulars out to random people on the internet, but it should suffice to say that I’m paying more than $0.

…which means that even though I took home a livable but not extravagant income last year, I will pay more in taxes than Bank of America and General Electric combined.

And if the wealthy people who run those companies take advantage of the same loopholes multibillionaire Warren Buffet uses to pay less proportionally in taxes than his secretary, odds are pretty good that I’ll be paying a higher percentage of my income in taxes than BofA and GE’s CEO and Board of Directors too.

And the Republican budget, which just passed the House, would have me pay even more of my income in taxes—to say nothing of the costs the Republican Party wants me to pay when my parents, who are in their fifties and thus would see their Medicare demolished by the GOP’s budget plan, retire and inevitably need medical attention, if they don’t have the money to pay out of pocket for it. All so that GE, Bank of America, and their CEOs and Boards of Directors can pay even less in income taxes.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy to pay my taxes. Taxes are the price I pay for living in a country with good public schools, medical insurance for the poor and elderly, and food stamps and unemployment insurance for folks who need it. (They’re also the price I pay for two pointless wars, an excessive and wasteful military-industrial complex, and subsidies to oil and gas companies for polluting our air, but that’s a discussion for another time.)

But it does seem a bit unfair to me that because I can’t shelter my income in the Cayman Islands, get my employer to pay me in the kind of income that falls under capital gains taxes, or pay an accountant year-round to find me loophole after loophole, I’m paying a more substantial percentage of my income in taxes than GE, Bank of America, and their CEOs and Boards of Directors.

And it also seems a bit unfair to me that while far too many middle-class folks like me worry about job security and our health insurance costs, while they look down the barrel of longer hours and benefit cuts just to keep their jobs, and while the labor movement is decimated in places like Wisconsin, Ohio, and Florida because “we can’t afford it,” and while we in the middle class are being asked by the wealthy (through the politicians and media companies they own) to “share in the sacrifice” of the economic downturn — GE, Bank of America, and their CEOs and Boards of Directors have yet to sacrifice anything.

In fact, they managed to stack the legislative deck such that the cost of a few tax breaks for folks like me—which would mean that many of my friends could buy school supplies for their kids or take a family trip this year—was the simultaneous extension of their tax cuts, the very cuts that brought on this budget mess to begin with. (Can you believe it was only just over ten short years ago when Bill Clinton left office with record surpluses?)

It seems to me that the rhetoric we’re seeing from the wealthy and from the politicians and media companies they own—statements like “we’re broke” or “we just don’t have the money” or “it’s time to tighten our belts”—aren’t telling the whole story, which is that every budget is a choice.

The revenue for next year’s budget isn’t set in stone; we have a choice between giving rich people more of the nation’s money or cutting vital services that poor people, children, disabled people, and the elderly need to survive, much less thrive.

Defense expenditures for next year’s budget aren’t set in stone; we have a choice between investing our money in more guns and bombs, or investing in things that help the people of the global south develop and build their own sustainable economies.

So what do we do to change the conversation, so that these choices are made clear?

How can we confront our media and our political leaders with the reality that every penny of the nation’s wealth that is given to the rich in the form of more tax cuts is another loaf of bread, another rent check or heating bill or electric bill, another needed immunization, stolen away from those who are in need?

I’m open to ideas.

(Tomorrow, Part II: The continued injustice of taxation without representation.)

Republicans to DC Residents: Drop Dead

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

Yep. The Republican Party has once again put their ideology ahead of my rights as a DC resident and American citizen. The DC Voting Rights bill is dead.

For those who aren’t aware, we residents of the District of Columbia pay full federal income taxes every year. We can be drafted to fight in America’s wars. Yet unlike every other taxpaying American citizen, we do not have representation in either house of Congress, and our laws are subject to review and veto by a Senate subcommittee that is completely unaccountable to us and our city’s interests. We are, in essence, second-class citizens, residents of a colony. We suffer under that which the founders of this country fought against – taxation without representation.

Many bills have gone before Congress to rectify this injustice – including one just this year, that almost passed – until Republican John Ensign attached an amendment stripping DC’s post-Heller restrictions on gun ownership. Whether it was intended as a poison pill or just another part of the Republican Party’s irresponsible “let’s all have guns” cowboy politics, it killed the DC Voting Rights bill.

Let me put that a bit more clearly: Republicans don’t care about DC residents’ rights – or at the very least, don’t care about them enough to put their ideology aside and do the right thing. They think I should have a right to keep an AR-15 assault rifle in my house, but they don’t think I should have the right to representation in Congress. (Of course, the real reason I suspect that Republicans are trying to kill DC’s congressional representation is that we’d invariably send a Democrat – and, of course, to the contemporary Republican Party, political gain trumps all principles, ideals, morals, or values.)

There were questions about whether the bill would pass constitutional muster, and it’s still only half-a-loaf – even if we do get a voting representative in the House, we would still be second-class citizens because we would lack representation in the Senate as well as the right to make our own laws without Congressional veto. But still – half a loaf is better than the none at all we currently get.

It’s becoming all too clear to me now that the only acceptable option for the District of Columbia is full statehood rights – at least one representative, two Senators, and full, unrestricted home rule. Anything less is continued acceptance of the colony status for DC – and that is absolutely unacceptable in a democratic republic.

Democracy begins at home. Those of you who have voting representatives have an obligation to contact them and demand statehood for DC.