There are 192 Democrats in the House of Representatives.
Since John Boehner has said himself that he has 60 Republicans who won’t vote for a debt ceiling increase under any circumstances, why doesn’t every question about his debt limit proposals revolve around whether he can get Democratic support for them?
Do the math for him: why haven’t you asked him about the reality that he will have to get at least 36 Democrats on board with any bill he wants to pass the House?
Why haven’t you asked him about the possibility that he might have to get 30-40 Republicans on board with Nancy Pelosi’s Democratic caucus to get something passed, since his own caucus is very clearly set on ignoring him?
Why aren’t more conversations among the pundits and talking heads focusing on the fact that Boehner might just be the weakest Speaker of the House in our nation’s history, since he’s obviously unable to whip his caucus in support of the deals they’ve already been offered—deals that any Republican in years past would’ve happily taken in a heartbeat?
I wonder if it’s considered too disrespectful for me to tell a United States Senator to bite me.
If it is, then I might phrase it as a request: “If I may, Senator Hatch: Please bite me.”
The poor need to share responsibility for the deficit? The poor need to sacrifice more than they’ve already sacrificed?
All so the billionaires can get more tax cuts?
Look at the economy right now, Senator Moneybags. It’s not the billionaires in that 16% U6 unemployment rate. It’s not the trust fund babies who are part of what’s soon to be a 25% child poverty rate. And it’s not the retired Lear Jet set who are worried about their Social Security checks or Medicare payments getting cut back.
No, those people are what we call “the poor.” (They used to be in that mysterious entity called “the middle class” until you and your Republican cronies killed that.) You know, those folks you think just haven’t given enough.
On the other hand, Senator Scrooge, I really do see your point: if we’re going to ask the wealthy to give up a few thousand-dollar bottles of wine per year, or maybe not buy that new Bentley, the least the poor can do is cut back a little on the luxuries too.
Like Grandma… she really could stand to cut back for a couple of months on that habit she has of eating meals.
Or Junior, with that nasty-sounding cough? He should just walk off like a man instead of going to see the doctor like a little wussbag.
And Pa, who hasn’t been able to get a job since they moved the factory overseas two years ago? He doesn’t really need a roof over his head, does he?
How dare these greedy, selfish poor ask the noble and ever-giving rich to sacrifice, when they’re unwilling to give up their luxurious lifestyles! We’re lucky the rich even let us have jobs at all! They could just sit on their money and not spend it, and leave us to rot. Truly we should not ask our benefactors to sacrifice more, not when we have given so little of ourselves.
Gaffe [\ˈgaf\]: When a politician accidentally tells the truth.
Host: “Does it strike you that as the unemployment rate goes up, your chances of winning office also go up?”
Bachmann: “Well, that could be. Again, I hope so.”
If there is one lesson from the past 2-1/2 years in American politics, it is that the Republican Party realizes that it has a vested interest in the failure of the American economy, because people who are out of work or watching their 401k’s tank are more likely to vote against the incumbent President.
And Michele Bachmann just laid bare their dirty little secret: Republicans are rooting against America.
As long as America has a Democrat at the helm, Republicans want it to fail.
As long as Barack Obama is in the White House, the Republican Party wants to see you and the people you love jobless, homeless, and desperate—because being jobless and homeless will make you want to vote against the incumbent President.
In other words, their partisan interest and their patriotic interest are at odds—and, when given the choice between the good of the nation and its people, and the good of their party, they clearly think the latter is more important.
Because—and here’s the real dirty secret—you’re not their constituency.*
When given a choice between the good of the rich and the good of the real people, the contemporary GOP has always—each and every time—chosen the rich.
If you remember only one thing when you go to the voting booth in November 2012, remember that. The Republicans on the ballot do not care about you. They do not care about ordinary Americans, except to use them for votes and support while they pursue policies that will destroy the working and middle class and help the wealthy and their corporations. If you are an ordinary American voting for Republicans, know that they will choose to sell you up the river when it comes down to the choice between your interests and the wealthy’s interests.
Because Republicans don’t care about America, at least not if by “America” you mean the hundreds of millions of ordinary middle-class and working-class folks who make up 99% of this country’s population.
They only care about the wealthy, because they are wealthy—and, as proper acolytes of Ayn Rand, they accept her anti-Christ Gospel, which tells them that the only person they should ever care about is themselves.
Michele Bachmann just made that crystal-clear. She cheers when more Americans are out of work, she cheers when more American families wonder where their next meal or their rent or mortgage payment is going to come from, she cheers when more American parents worry that their child might get sick because they can’t afford healthcare.
As long as it helps her election chances, as long as it makes it more likely that a Republican will sit in the Oval Office in January 2013, she will hoot and holler and drink a toast in celebration of the suffering of ordinary Americans.
But there’s the gaffe: she’s not supposed to do it in public.
* I suppose it’s theoretically possible that a hedge-fund officer, bank executive, or billionaire corporate board member is reading this blog post, in which case, you actually are the Republicans’ constituency.
I'm a Ph.D. student at the University of Maryland, College Park, studying rhetoric and political communication, and a digital media researcher and analyst at Dewey Digital, LLC. My main area of focus is the intersection between religion, politics, and culture.
@tom_greene@atilsley should your job protection have been dependent on whether your principal liked you? i think people deserve more. jamesggilmore2012/02/16
@tom_greene@atilsley and if your being an outspoken advocate had rocked the principal's boat too much, you'd have no other protection. jamesggilmore2012/02/16
@tom_greene@atilsley protecting #teachers helps #students. no tenure means outspoken teachers, or who don't teach to the test, are fired. jamesggilmore2012/02/16
New Blog Post: #VoterID Laws and â#VoterFraudâ http://t.co/xKRPKvUi #tlot #tcot #p2 jamesggilmore2012/02/14
@BobBowdon it's also control. when the public owns a thing, it's controlled by people the #public elects. who controls for-profit #charters? jamesggilmore2012/02/14